Explainer·Deep Dive

Side by Side vs UTV vs SxS: They're All the Same Vehicle

These three terms describe identical machines — the naming split comes from manufacturer branding preferences and regional dialects, not vehicle differences.

Brett Garrison May 27, 2026 3 min read
Side by Side vs UTV vs SxS: They're All the Same Vehicle
ROHVA (Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Association) publishes ANSI/ROHVA 1-2016, t

What the Industry Standard Actually Says

ROHVA (Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle Association) publishes ANSI/ROHVA 1-2016, the American National Standard that defines these machines. The official term in that standard is "ROV" — Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle.

The standard defines ROVs as vehicles with: - Automotive-style steering wheels (not handlebars) - Bench or bucket seating for two or more occupants seated side by side - Four or more wheels - Non-straddle seating (you sit *in* it, not *on* it like an ATV).

That's the technical definition. In practice, the market uses three different names for machines meeting those exact specs.

Side by Side vs UTV vs SxS: They're All the Same Vehicle - supporting photo

Why "UTV" Became the Generic Term

UTV stands for Utility Terrain Vehicle. The name emphasizes work capability — cargo beds, towing capacity, tool mounts. It's the term most commonly used.

  • Agricultural contexts and farm equipment publications.
  • OSHA documentation (though OSHA doesn't regulate recreational UTVs specifically, the term appears in workplace safety guidance).
  • Insurance policies and registration paperwork in most states.
  • Parts catalogs and aftermarket accessory listings.

The utility framing made sense when these machines were primarily ranch and farm tools. Early models from manufacturers like Kawasaki and John Deere were explicitly marketed as work vehicles that happened to have recreational potential.

Where "Side by Side" Came From

Polaris popularized "side by side" (often written as one word: sidebyside) when they launched the RZR line in 2008. The name highlights the seating configuration — the defining difference between these machines and ATVs, where you straddle the seat.

The term stuck because it's descriptive and immediately clear to someone who's never seen one. You sit next to your passenger.

Polaris still uses this terminology across their entire lineup, from utility-focused Rangers to sport models. It's become the dominant consumer-facing term, especially in recreational contexts. When someone at a trailhead asks "is that a side by side?", they're usually not thinking about cargo capacity or work applications — they're identifying the seating layout.

Side by Side - exterior view
Side by Side - detail view

The "SxS" Abbreviation

SxS is just shorthand for "side by side," but it's taken on a life of its own. Can-Am and some other manufacturers use it as their primary branding term. You'll see it most often.

  • Online forums and enthusiast communities.
  • Social media hashtags and user-generated content.
  • Dealership signage and marketing materials.
  • Trail maps and off-road park regulations.

The abbreviation emerged organically from online discussions where typing "side by side" repeatedly got tedious. It's faster, fits better in headlines, and has a technical look that appeals to the performance crowd.

Some riders insist there's a difference — that SxS refers specifically to sport models while UTV means utility rigs. That distinction doesn't hold up. Manufacturers use the terms interchangeably across their entire product ranges.

Side by Side vs UTV vs SxS: They're All the Same Vehicle - figure 4

Regional and Context Variations

Geography and use case influence which term dominates.

Western US trails and desert riding: SxS is most common, reflecting the sport-focused culture and Can-Am's strong presence in these markets.

Midwest and agricultural areas: UTV prevails, tied to the work-vehicle origins and the farming community's preference for utility-first terminology.

Dealerships and manufacturers: Each brand picks one term and sticks with it for consistency. Polaris = side by side. Can-Am = SxS. Honda and Kawasaki lean toward UTV.

Legal and regulatory documents: UTV appears most frequently because it predates the consumer marketing terms and remains the standard in administrative contexts.

I've watched customers get genuinely confused when their insurance policy says "UTV" but the dealer paperwork says "side by side" and the owner's manual uses "ROV." They're all describing the same machine sitting in your garage.

Key Questions

01 Is there a technical difference between UTV side?
No. All three terms describe the same vehicle category: steering wheel, side-by-side seating, four wheels, cargo bed. The split comes from manufacturer branding choices, not vehicle specs.

→ Focus on actual specifications like bed capacity and suspension travel instead of terminology.

02 Which term should I use when talking to my?
Use whatever term appears in your policy documents. Most insurance paperwork defaults to 'UTV' because it predates consumer marketing terms.

→ Check your policy language and match it to avoid confusion during claims.

03 Are ATVs and UTVs the same thing?
No. ATVs have handlebars and straddle seating. UTVs have steering wheels and side-by-side bench seating. Trail access rules, licensing, and insurance treat them differently.

→ Verify which vehicle type your trail permit or registration covers.

04 Why do search results change when I use?
Aftermarket suppliers and forum communities often pick one term and stick with it. Searching only 'UTV roof' misses products listed under 'SxS roof' even though they fit the same machines.

→ Search all three terms (UTV, side by side, SxS) to see complete product options.

What This Means When You're Shopping

The terminology split creates practical headaches.

Search results fragment. Looking for accessories? You'll find different products depending on whether you search "UTV roof," "side by side roof," or "SxS roof" — even though they fit the same vehicles. Search all three terms to see complete options.

Forum advice gets siloed. Someone asking about clutch maintenance on a "UTV forum" and someone asking the same question on a "SxS forum" might never find each other's answers, despite working on identical drivetrains.

Spec comparisons get muddled. Trying to compare a "Polaris Ranger side by side" to a "Can-Am Defender UTV"? They're the same category. Focus on actual specifications — bed capacity, suspension travel, engine displacement — not the naming convention.

The vehicle doesn't change based on what you call it. A Polaris RZR and a Can-Am Maverick are both sport side-by-sides, both SxS models, both UTVs, and both ROVs under the ANSI standard. The machine's capabilities matter; the label doesn't.